Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page1 of 31

1 FUTTERMAN DUPREE DODD CROLEY MAIER LLP
MARTIN H. DODD (104363)
2 180 Sansome Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
3 Telephone: (415) 399-3840
Facsimile: (415) 399-3838
4 mdodd@fddcm.com
5 Attorneys for Receiver
J. Clark Kelso
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 MARCIANO PLATA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
14
Defendants.

Case No. C01-1351 TEH

15
16 RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
19
Defendants.

Case No. CIV S-90-0520 KJM-DAD

20
21 JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
22
v.
23
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
24
Defendants.

Case No. C94-2307 CW

25
26

NOTICE OF FILING OF RECEIVER’S
TWENTY-NINTH TRI-ANNUAL REPORT

27
28
FUTTERMAN DUPREE
DODD CROLEY
MAIER LLP

1
NOTICE OF FILING OF RECEIVER’S TWENTY-NINTH TRI-ANNUAL REPORT
CASE NOS. C01-1351 TEH, CIV S-90-0520 KJM-DAD AND C94-2307 CW

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page2 of 31

1

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Receiver in Plata v. Schwarzenegger, Case No. C01-

2 1351 TEH, has filed herewith his Twenty-Ninth Tri-Annual Report.
3 Dated: June 1, 2015
4
5
6

FUTTERMAN DUPREE
DODD CROLEY MAIER LLP
By:/s/ Martin H. Dodd
Martin H. Dodd
Attorneys for Receiver J. Clark Kelso

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FUTTERMAN DUPREE
DODD CROLEY
MAIER LLP

2
NOTICE OF FILING OF RECEIVER’S TWENTY-NINTH TRI-ANNUAL REPORT
CASE NOS. C01-1351 TEH, CIV S-90-0520 KJM-DAD AND C94-2307 CW

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page3 of 31

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page4 of 31

California Correctional Health Care Receivership
Vision:
As soon as practicable, provide constitutionally adequate
medical care to patients of the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation within a delivery system
the State can successfully manage and sustain.

Mission:
Reduce avoidable morbidity and mortality and protect
public health by providing patients timely access to safe,
effective and efficient medical care, and integrate the
delivery of medical care with mental health, dental and
disability programs.

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page5 of 31

Table of Contents
Page

1.

Executive Summary and Reporting Requirements…..………………………………………….

1

A. Reporting Requirements and New Reporting Format ………………………………………

1

B. Progress during this Reporting Period …………….…………………………..………………….. 2
C. Particular Problems Faced by the Receiver, Including Any Specific Obstacles
Presented by Institutions or Individuals…………………………..………………………………. 4
2.

Status and Progress Concerning Remaining Statewide Gaps………………………………

6

A. Availability and Usability of Health Information……….………………………………………

6

B. Scheduling and Access to Care…………………………………………………………………………. 6
C. Care Management……………………………………………………………………………………………

7

D. Facilities…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9
3.

Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement Program………………………………... 11

4.

Receiver’s Delegation of Authority………………………………………..……..……………………

15

5.

Other Matters Deemed Appropriate for Judicial Review………..…………………………..

19

A.

California Health Care Facility – Level of Care Delivered………………………………..

19

B.

Statewide Medical Staff Recruitment and Retention……………………………………..

21

C.

Joint Commission………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25

D.

Coordination with Other Lawsuits.………..………………………………………………………

25

E.

Master Contract Waiver Reporting………..………………………………………………………

25

F.

Consultant Staff Engaged by the Receiver……………………………………………………… 25

G.

Accounting of Expenditures…………………………………………………………………………… 26
1. Expenses ……………………….………………………………………………………………………….

26

2. Revenues ……………………….…………………………………………………………………………. 26

i

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page6 of 31

Section 1: Executive Summary and Reporting Requirements
A. Reporting Requirements and New Reporting Format
This is the twenty-ninth report filed by the Receivership, and the twenty-third submitted by
Receiver J. Clark Kelso.
The Order Appointing Receiver (Appointing Order) filed February 14, 2006, calls for the Receiver
to file status reports with the Plata Court concerning the following issues:
1. All tasks and metrics contained in the Turnaround Plan of Action (Plan) and subsequent
reports, with degree of completion and date of anticipated completion of each task
and metric.
2. Particular problems being faced by the Receiver, including any specific obstacles
presented by institutions or individuals.
3. Particular success achieved by the Receiver.
4. An accounting of expenditures for the reporting period.
5. Other matters deemed appropriate for judicial review.
(Reference pages 2–3 of the Appointing Order at
http://www.cphcs.ca.gov/docs/court/PlataOrderAppointingReceiver0206.pdf)
Judge Thelton Henderson issued an order on March 27, 2014, entitled Order Re: Receiver’s
Tri-Annual Report wherein he directs the Receiver to discuss in each Tri-Annual Report the level
of care being delivered at California Health Care Facility (CHCF); difficulties with recruiting and
retaining medical staff statewide; sustainability of the reforms the Receiver has achieved and
plans to achieve; updates on the development of an independent system for evaluating the
quality of care; and the degree, if any, to which custodial interference with the delivery of care
remains a problem.
The Receiver filed a report on March 10, 2015, entitled Receiver’s Special Report:
Improvements in the Quality of California’s Prison Medical Care System wherein he outlined the
significant progress in improving the delivery of medical care in California’s prisons and also the
remaining significant gaps and failures that must still be addressed. The identified gaps are
availability and usability of health information; scheduling and access to care; care
management; and health care infrastructure at facilities.
In an effort to streamline the Tri-Annual Report format for this and future reports, the Receiver
will report on all items ordered by Judge Thelton Henderson, with the exception of updates to
completed tasks and metrics contained in the Plan. Previous reports contained status updates
for completed Plan items; these updates will be removed going forward, unless the Court or the
Receiver determines a particular item requires discussion in the Tri-Annual Report.

Page 1 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page7 of 31

To assist the reader, this Report provides two (2) forms of supporting data:
• Appendices: This Report references documents in the Appendices of this Report.
• Website References: Website references are provided whenever possible.
In support of the coordination efforts by the three (3) federal courts responsible for the major
health care class actions pending against California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR), the Receiver files the Tri-Annual Report in three (3) different federal
court class action cases: Armstrong, Coleman, and Plata. An overview of the Receiver’s
enhanced reporting responsibilities related to these cases and to other Plata orders filed after
the Appointing Order can be found in the Receiver’s Eleventh Tri-Annual Report on pages 15
and 16. (http://www.cphcs.ca.gov/receiver othr per reps.aspx)
Court coordination activities include: facilities and construction; telemedicine and information
technology; pharmacy; recruitment and hiring; credentialing and privileging; and
space coordination.
B. Progress during this Reporting Period
Progress towards improving the quality of health care in California’s prisons continues for the
reporting period of January 1, 2015, through April 30, 2015, and includes the following:
Office of the Inspector General – Cycle 4
The Office of Inspector General’s (OIG’s) Cycle 4 Medical Inspections commenced during the
week of January 26, 2015. The first facility inspected was Folsom State Prison (FSP), followed
by Correctional Training Facility, California Rehabilitation Center (CRC), California Correctional
Center, and North Kern State Prison (NKSP) during this reporting period. The OIG has issued its
final report for FSP, and the institution received an overall rating of “Adequate.” California
Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) has compiled information regarding FSP for
consideration by the Receiver and stakeholders.
Armstrong
CCHCS staff continue in their progress to implement a reliable solution for providing sign
language interpreters at all clinical encounters. Following successful field testing, a vendor was
selected to provide on-demand video remote interpreting (VRI) services for all medical
encounters, including psychiatric technician rounds completed in segregated housing units.
Corrections Services purchased portable workstations that connect wirelessly to the internet
and provide VRI services in the nine (9) impacted institutions. Included in this initiative is the
installation of additional desktop cameras at specific clinical locations to extend the availability
of this service to the needed areas. Policy and procedure updates were completed and are
undergoing internal stakeholder review and approval with an anticipated implementation by
July 2015.

Page 2 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page8 of 31

Coccidioidomycosis Testing
In January 2015, CCHCS conducted mass coccidioidomycosis (cocci) skin testing.
CCHCS analyzed the mass screening data in depth and found that less than five (5) percent of
patients tested had adverse reactions. CCHCS also found that while 38 percent of patients
accepted the testing, the acceptance rate varied by race/ethnicity. Among African Americans,
25 percent accepted the test; in contrast, 44 percent of Latinos and 46 percent of Whites
accepted the test. The acceptance of the cocci skin test by patients also varied by location.
For example, 41 percent of patients at Avenal State Prison (ASP) accepted the test, while only
29 percent of patients at Pleasant Valley State Prison (PVSP) accepted the cocci skin test. While
the positive test rate overall was 8.6 percent, the positive test rate among patients currently
residing at ASP or PVSP was 16.2 percent and the positive test rate among patients residing in
counties that are not considered to be “cocci endemic” was only 7.6 percent.
After the mass cocci skin testing, CCHCS initiated cocci skin testing in the reception centers and
continues to offer the cocci skin test to patients who have not been tested. As of
April 29, 2015, 80 percent of men currently residing in CDCR institutions have been offered the
cocci skin test. Of those men offered the cocci skin test, 39 percent accepted the test and of
those who accepted the test, 99.6 percent (35,150 men) were actually tested. Of the men
tested, 32,130 tested negative. As planned, CCHCS revised the Quality Management Cocci Risk
Registry to incorporate the results of the cocci skin test and those who tested negative are now
medically restricted from residing in the Cocci 2 Area (ASP and PVSP).
Currently, CCHCS continues to offer the cocci skin test to the 10,742 untested patients who are
not already excluded from residence at ASP or PVSP for either custody reasons
(e.g., condemned patients) or medical reasons (e.g., medical high risk). CCHCS continues to
educate all patients about the cocci skin test, including information about adverse effects and
the positive test rate in the CCHCS population. The cocci skin test is available to any patient
who requests the test, if the patient has not already been tested.
CCHCS plans to offer testing to patients residing in out-of-state prisons (e.g., California
Out-of-State Facility patients). The education for these patients on the cocci skin test has
started and the offer of cocci skin testing will commence in August 2015.
CCHCS also continues to confer with counterparts at the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the California Department of Public Health regarding CCHCS’ cocci
prevention program.

Page 3 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page9 of 31

C. Particular Problems Faced by the Receiver, Including Any Specific Obstacles Presented by

Institutions or Individuals

Although progress continues for this reporting period, the Receiver continues to face the
following challenges:
In-State Contracting for Community Correctional Facilities
As reported in the Twenty-eighth Tri-Annual Report, little progress has been made in resolving,
much less improving, the quality of care provided to the approximately 4,200 patients housed
at the seven (7) contracted Modified Community Correctional Facilities (MCCF) in California.
On-site audits have consistently and repeatedly highlighted poor clinical performance deficits
and a lack of accountability. Although CDCR added registered nurse (RN) coverage on all three
(3) shifts, systemic failures in the delivery of medical care include failure to consistently employ
and retain qualified physicians, and failure to establish performance metrics as well as quality
improvement processes. Under the current staffing model, there continues to be a lack of
consistency in the qualifications, ongoing training, performance and accountability of physicians
and clinical staff in general. Although the CDCR contract calls for the physicians to provide
coverage five (5) days a week, several of the facilities are unable to secure a qualified physician.
In at least one (1) case during this reporting period, patients did not have access to a physician
for well over a month. These lapses cause patients to be returned to CDCR institutions where
the medically necessary care is provided by CCHCS clinical staff instead of the contractor’s staff.
At the end of May 2015, CCHCS submitted recommendations to CDCR’s Contract Beds Unit
identifying the need to amend the current contract. The recommendations detailed necessary
changes to the existing MCCF contract language that would address health care delivery gaps
and clearly define physician expectations as it relates to health care staffing and the
relationships between health care delivered at the MCCF and the associated CDCR
hub institution.
On April 15, 2015, in a population status benchmark report submitted to the Three-Judge Panel,
the CDCR announced success in exceeding the court-ordered reduction by several thousand
inmates. Shortly thereafter, CCHCS was requested by the CDCR to collaborate in facilitating the
return of one-fourth of the approximately 8,100 inmates from four (4) existing out-of-state
contract facilities. This shift will likely increase the CDCR’s reliance on the MCCF capacity at a
time when the quality and access to care at these facilities continues to decline. The CCHCS and
CDCR staff are working collaboratively to implement additional remedial plans for the delivery
of health care in the MCCFs.
Transportation Vehicles
The management of transportation vehicles, a function previously delegated by the Receiver to
the Secretary, has been slow to emerge. Over the course of the past year, CCHCS successfully
delivered 47 replacement vehicles to institutions. The CDCR continues in its efforts to retrofit
these vehicles with the appropriate security modifications and install law enforcement
Page 4 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page10 of 31

telecommunication radios. These vehicles are scheduled to be placed into service at the end of
the second quarter of 2015.
In September 2014, CDCR initiated procurement for the first of 13 medical Emergency
Response Vehicles (ERVs).
During this reporting period, CCHCS took delivery of
three (3) ERVs, and was advised the fourth and final procurement endeavor for four (4)
additional ERVs was processed on April 24, 2015, and is pending award.
Lastly, the purchase orders for five (5) para-transit vehicles was awarded effective April 3, 2015,
and are scheduled for delivery the first quarter of 2016. The procurement of the one (1)
22-passenger para-transit bus did not occur, although negotiations continue between CDCR and
the vendor. The repeated efforts of CCHCS staff to obtain a procurement plan for the ongoing
replacement of medical transportation vehicles were met with little progress. However, CDCR
is now in the initial stages of developing an overall vehicle replacement plan that will
encompass an annual survey and assessment of all vehicles. Upon receipt of the survey data,
CDCR, working collaboratively with CCHCS, will reassess and develop an overall vehicle
procurement plan on an annual basis.

Page 5 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page11 of 31

Section 2: Status and Progress Concerning Remaining Statewide Gaps
As reported in the Receiver’s Special Report: Improvements in the Quality of California’s Prison
Medical Care System, and as cited in Judge Thelton Henderson’s Order Modifying Receivership
Transition Plan, the following statewide gaps remain: availability and usability of health
information, scheduling and access to care, care management, and health care infrastructure at
facilities. The following are updates on each of the remaining gaps:
A. Availability and Usability of Health Information
As reported in the Twenty-eighth Tri-Annual Report, Cerner Corporation has been selected to
provide a commercial “off-the-shelf” Electronic Health Records System (EHRS) for CCHCS. This
system will provide CCHCS and CDCR demonstrable and sustained benefits to patient safety,
quality and efficiency of care, and staff efficiencies and satisfaction. The EHRS project is part of
a larger organizational transformation project entitled ECHOS – Electronic Correctional
Healthcare Operational System. The project is presently in the Testing Phase.
During this reporting period, the EHRS project team initiated user-acceptance and
system-acceptance testing on the workflows for more than 192 health care delivery processes.
The project team performed a “Mock” clinic that demonstrated the solution build, to date, for
the different modules to include Computer Provider Order Entry, mental health, scheduling,
PowerChart, and ambulatory care. Project Communication and Organizational Change
Management team members have continued the Learning and Adoption Phase engaging
Change Ambassadors from the field and headquarters to provide solution demonstrations to
their respective sites and staff. Additionally, several ECHOS articles (e.g., Devices, Project Roles,
Information Technology support) and testimonial videos have been published and distributed
informing enterprise-wide staff on the new EHRS. Finally, the training team is finalizing the
curriculum and training material to support the approved training plan.
The EHRS project team continues to support the integration of an electronic dental record
solution into the EHRS and is presently monitoring the completion of the
requirements document.
Overall, the ECHOS project is 48 percent complete, and implementation of the EHRS will begin
in October 2015.
B. Scheduling and Access to Care
Scheduling Process Improvement Initiative
In 2014, CCHCS introduced a statewide Scheduling Process Improvement (SPI) Initiative, which
provided a structured process and a set of tools to improve access to care and scheduling
efficiency locally. Phase I of the initiative included information and activities to improve the
reliability of scheduling data, use of performance data to target specific scheduling processes,
and the application of quality improvement techniques to improve scheduling efficiency and
Page 6 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page12 of 31

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page13 of 31

patient acuity level. Policy and training for the use of this tool is in development with an
implementation targeted for the summer of 2015.
The Care Coordination subgroup has also updated the Medication Management policy and
procedures to be reflective of the Complete Care Model of health care delivery. The policy and
procedures are currently in the executive approval process with a target date for training in late
June or July 2015 and a statewide implementation in August 2015.
Integral to Nursing Care Management, the Care Coordination subgroup is also:
• Establishing Patient Service Plans, a tool used for patient management. This tool is the
basis for Population Risk Stratification, which will standardize terminology and guide
resource utilization in the management of entire patient populations.
• Developing Nursing Care Management policy and procedure, Reference Manual and
Operational Guide. Training on Care Management of Complex Care Patients is planned
for late summer of 2015.
• Developing Disease Management Protocols for Nursing Care Managers. Implementation
of Care Management of Complex Care Patients is planned for the fall of 2015.
• Developing, modifying and updating Complete Care Model series of policies and
procedures which will incorporate Access to Primary Care, Primary Care Model,
Preventive Clinical Services, Outpatient Specialty Services, Physical Therapy, Reception
Health Care Policy and Chronic Care Disease Management. The Complete Care Model
policy and procedure, which is the anchor of the series, is currently in the executive
review process. Completion of the series of policies is planned for the summer and fall
of 2015. Next steps will be training development and implementation planning that will
occur in the fall or winter of 2015.
Transfer Subgroup
In the fall of 2014, the Transfer subgroup of the PMCC Committee has bolstered the Medical
Hold process, in which clinicians have the ability to hold patients at their institution until they
are medically safe to be transferred to another institution. This ability prevents inappropriate
transfers that could cause health care concerns for the patients. The ability to place a medical
hold on a patient is now available electronically on the Medical Classification Chrono
application. This application automatically transfers medical hold information to the Strategic
Offender Management System simultaneously, and places a movement warning on the patient.
The subgroup has completed statewide education to both clinical and custodial staff. CCHCS is
currently in the process of provisioning RN staff statewide to give RNs the ability to place a
temporary medical hold on a patient to prevent inappropriate and unsafe transfers.
The transfer subgroup has also updated the Health Care Transfer policy and procedure, which is
currently undergoing final revisions as recommended during the approval process. Several new
tools were developed and are included in the draft procedure including an automated Patient
Summary sheet, which will also be an essential tool for care management, and a transfer
check-list. Train-the-trainer training for the new transfer tools and processes were conducted in
Page 8 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page14 of 31

April 2015. Training of all institutional nursing staff and statewide implementation is expected
by July 31, 2015.
Care Coordination and Case Management Tool – Patient Summary
In early 2015, Regional Nurse Executives and the Population Management Care Coordination
Steering Committee organized a workgroup to develop a Patient Summary tool for screening
clinical appropriateness for possible patient transfers, and to coordinate those transfers and
ensure continuity of care. The Patient Summary, included as Appendix 1, is designed to be a
clinical snapshot providing the most relevant patient health information including:
• Patient Demographics.
• Scheduling and Access to Care – Effective communication, disability status,
accommodations, list of upcoming appointments, prior high priority
specialty appointments.
• Medication Management – Polypharmacy, allergies, recently expired medications, list of
active medications.
• Care Management – Prior higher level of care events, most recent Medical Classification
Chrono, durable medical equipment.
• Disease Management and Prevention – Existing alerts from patient registries, list of
diagnoses, dates / status of preventive care and screening.
The Patient Summary will also be used by care teams during their daily huddles and as decision
support during complex care management activities.
D. Facilities
Regarding clinical facility upgrades through the Health Care Facility Improvement Program
(HCFIP) projects, the last five (5) projects are in the preliminary design phase and 26 projects
have proceeded into and/or have completed the working drawings phase. Of those 26 projects,
19 projects have been approved by the Office of the State Fire Marshal (SFM) and submitted to
the Department of Finance (DOF) for approval to proceed to bid. To date, DOF has approved 16
of the 19 projects. The DOF also approved the award of contracts to general contractors for the
HCFIP projects at Mule Creek State Prison (MCSP) and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
(RJD). Nine (9) more projects (California Institution for Men, California Institution for Women,
California Men’s Colony, California Medical Facility, Deuel Vocational Institution, FSP, NKSP,
California State Prison – Sacramento [SAC], and Wasco State Prison [WSP]) are scheduled to be
advertised for bid in May and June, 2015. In addition, significant procurement and mobilization
activities are occurring by Inmate Ward Labor (IWL). The IWL construction (shovel in the
ground) activities are underway for HCFIP projects at several institutions (ASP, California State
Prison – Los Angeles County, SAC, RJD, and California State Prison – Solano) and for Statewide
Medication Distribution projects at several other institutions (Calipatria State Prison, California
Correctional Center, Centinela State Prison, Chuckawalla Valley State Prison, High Desert State
Prison, and Ironwood State Prison).

Page 9 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page15 of 31

Some schedule adjustments occurred due to additional design time required to implement SFM
code compliance for general contractor documents, to reflect general contractor bid and award
dates, and CDCR/CCHCS efforts to ensure integration of operational continuity plans and swing
space. The revised schedules continue to reflect construction at ASP being completed in 2015
and construction of the remaining projects being completed in 2016 and 2017.
While CDCR continues to face schedule and budget challenges of the HCFIP projects and
significant challenges in maintaining operational continuity in the facilities during construction,
CDCR sustains the commitment, focus, and ability to manage construction and activation of
these complex projects.

Page 10 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page16 of 31

Section 3: Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement Program
QM Program Infrastructure Update
The CCHCS Quality Management Program is composed of foundational elements including a
strategic planning process, performance evaluation system, communication and coordination of
improvement activities, use of nationally-recognized improvement tools and techniques, and
staff development programs to build quality improvement capacity. The present Quality
Management governance structure in place is the mechanism for coordinating these elements
so that the health care system operates efficiently and effectively. During this reporting period,
the Statewide Quality Management Committee (QMC) convened for three (3) sessions and
discussed 2014 performance trends and best practices, potential updates to the Performance
Improvement Plan for 2016–18, Joint Commission mock survey at headquarters, and the
Receiver’s Transition Plan and delegation process.
In addition to the governance structure at the statewide level, institutions are also required to
have a well-functioning set of committee structures in place locally. The Institution QMC is
responsible for developing and disseminating their annual Performance Improvement Work
Plan (PIWP) and updating the PIWP at least quarterly; assigning improvement projects to
subcommittees; monitoring the progress of projects and related performance objectives; and
intervening when projects are not showing progress, among other functions. To support an
effective local committee structure, Quality Management Support Units (QMSUs) are being
trained on committee support tools, resources, and techniques. Training will be offered in the
following three (3) major parts over the next three (3) to six (6) months:
•

•

•

Part 1, Quality Management Committee Structure – Focuses on the purpose and
functions of the committee structure; roles and responsibilities of various staff involved
in committees either as a chairperson, member, or support staff; and the tools and
resources available to help staff organize, coordinate, communicate, and manage
change using the committee structure.
Part 2, Managing Improvement Projects – Teaches staff nationally-recognized problem
analysis and improvement techniques and when to use them; applying the Cycle of
Change as a framework for managing change; and effective use of project management
tools and techniques to support a local Quality/Process Improvement Team.
Part 3, Data Driven Decision-Making – An in-depth look at ways in which data can be
used to identify and analyze quality problems and assess progress toward
improvement goals.

Polypharmacy Improvement Initiative
As of April 2015, five (5) percent of the total patient population in CDCR, or more than 6,300
patients, had current prescriptions for ten (10) or more medications. Many of these patients
are considered clinically complex, and all are at risk for medication adherence problems and
drug-drug interactions. To address this patient safety concern, the Statewide Patient Safety
and Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees formed an interdisciplinary workgroup to develop
Page 11 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page17 of 31

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page18 of 31

Patient Safety Priorities
During this reporting period, the Statewide Patient Safety Committee selected the following
eight (8) improvement priorities for the next 12–18 months with an emphasis on improving
program infrastructure and tackling system vulnerabilities that place patients at risk for
adverse/sentinel events:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Establish a Medication Process Improvement Initiative.
Implement a Quarterly Health Care Incident Reporting Dashboard.
Refine the Health Care Incident Reporting Taxonomy.
Update the Health Care Incident Reporting Process.
Simplify the Health Care Incident Reporting Form.
Provide Patient Safety Program Update Training.
Re-survey Health Care Staff on Patient Safety Culture.
Disseminate the 2015 Annual Patient Safety Report.

Patient Safety Priority – Quarterly Dashboard
Health care incident reports have been collected since 2012 and data from the reporting
system has been analyzed and summarized for various audiences, but was not made available
in an accessible format for health care staff until now. The Patient Safety Quarterly Dashboard,
currently in its final stages of design and testing, will provide institution-specific data regarding
incidents reported through the Health Care Incident Reporting System during a reporting
quarter, and includes a summary of incident reports received, details related to medication
errors and root cause analyses, and record-level data for deeper analysis and trending. Every
quarter, the Patient Safety Dashboard will summarize major statewide findings and activities
during the quarter, for example:
•

•

•

During the first quarter of 2015, there were 1,261 health care incidents reported
through the Health Care Incident Reporting System. This is more than twice the number
reported during the first quarter of 2014, suggesting that health care staff are becoming
more comfortable using this reporting system.
Medication errors represent approximately 90 percent of all reported health care
incidents; however, the vast majority of the errors did not harm patients (i.e., less than
Level 4), which is good news because it provides opportunities to improve clinical
processes before harm occurs.
In 2014, 35 reported cases were identified as adverse/sentinel events requiring a Root
Cause Analysis. Of those 35 events, 54 percent involved breakdowns during transitions
of care or handoffs, which have already been identified as a major improvement priority
by leadership resulting in changes in the transfer process and development of decision
tools and training spearheaded by Population Management Care Coordination
Steering Committee.

Page 13 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page19 of 31

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page20 of 31

Section 4: Receiver’s Delegation of Authority
Receivership Transition Plan
On March 10, 2015, Judge Thelton Henderson issued an order, entitled Order Modifying
Receivership Transition Plan, modifying the plan for how health care will be transitioned back to
the State of California. Using the successful model that was used to resolve the dental lawsuit
under Perez, the new plan focuses on transitioning prisons back one at a time after the
Receiver, through several steps, determines that a prison is providing adequate medical care.
Under the plan, the OIG first completes their medical inspection of the prison and provides an
overall rating regarding the care provided (as previously reported, the OIG has redesigned its
medical inspection process by enhancing its quantitative compliance testing and adding
qualitative clinical case reviews). There are three (3) rating categories: Proficient, Adequate, or
Inadequate. Should a prison receive an Adequate or Proficient rating, the Receiver will then
consider the OIG report, as well as data from the CCHCS dashboard and other internal
monitoring tools. If the Receiver determines that an institution is suitable for return to CDCR
control, he will execute a revocable delegation of authority to the Secretary of CDCR to take
over management of that institution’s medical care. The Receiver’s delegation creates a
rebuttable presumption that medical care provided in the prison is constitutionally adequate.
In addition, prior to executing any delegation of authority, the Receiver must meet and confer
with both parties to the lawsuit, as well as consult with the court experts. Under the new
order, any party that disagrees with the Receiver’s delegation decision (either to delegate or
not delegate) may challenge the decision by filing a motion in court. However, that party would
have the burden of proof.
The Receiver will also continue to determine the appropriateness and timing of delegating
additional core headquarters functions to CDCR. When a prison or headquarters function is
delegated to CDCR, the Receiver will provide monthly monitoring reports to the Court that
provide a public record concerning the performance of the operations. A delegation can be
revoked by the Receiver after meeting with both parties and the court experts. However, if the
Receiver leaves all delegations in place without revocation for a one-year period certifying that
all functions and institutions have been delegated, it will create a rebuttable presumption of
system-wide constitutional adequacy and sustainability. When that occurs, the Prison Law
Office will have 120 days in which to challenge the presumption. If no such motion is filed, the
Court will proceed with steps to terminate the Receivership and the underlying Plata case.

Page 15 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page21 of 31

Access Quality Report
Field Operations staff continue to receive the required monthly Access Quality Report (AQR)
data from institutions and publish the monthly statewide AQR. Refer to Appendix 2 for the
Executive Summary and Health Care Access Quality Report for December 2014 through March
2015. Due to recent turnover in institution Health Care Access Unit (HCAU) Analysts,
Field Operations staff provided AQR training at CCHCS headquarters on March 27, 2015. Staff
from six (6) institutions attended.
During this reporting period, Field Operations staff continued to collaborate and coach
institution staff on improving data collection processes, specifically with tracking and reporting
patient access to mental health group appointments. As a result, institutions were reminded of
the statewide mandate, which requires the outcomes of all priority health care ducats, inclusive
of those issued for mental health group appointments, be recorded on a custody tracking sheet
for data validation purposes. As these institutions began utilizing the required custody tracking
process, many challenges were encountered with capturing and recording the outcomes due to
the enormous volume of appointments. This problem surfaced at MCSP as of the
December 2014 AQR publication. Their score of 26.49 percent ultimately caused the statewide
overall custody performance indicator to fall below the Receiver’s benchmark of 99 percent as
outlined in the delegation related to HCAUs. While showing improvement since the December
report, the monthly statewide overall custody performance indicator has not met or exceeded
the benchmark.
As indicated in previous Tri-Annual Reports, the time and shift system (“TeleStaff”) does not
provide certain data points the institutions are required to report to complete the AQR.
TeleStaff continues to require adapted data retrieval methods for Transportation and Medical
Guarding hourly overtime, permanent intermittent employee, and redirected staff hours. Since
the institutions are unable to extract the data utilizing a single report, Field Operations staff has
trained all HCAU Analysts at the institutions on how to accurately obtain and calculate the
information. As a result of ongoing discussion between the Division of Adult Institution’s
Program Support Unit and Field Operations staff, the Program Support Unit staff is developing a
single reporting mechanism for the analysts to utilize.
Custody Access to Care Success Rate
Statewide AQRs were published for the months of December 2014 through March 2015 during
this reporting period. The average custody Access to Care Success Rate for this period was
93.75 percent, below the Receiver’s benchmark of 99 percent as explained in the preceding
section of this report. This represents a decrease of 5.83 percentage points as compared to the
Twenty-eighth Tri-Annual reporting period (inclusive of data from August through
November 2014).
Refer to Figure 5 for a summary, by month, of the number of institutions failing to attain the 99
percent benchmark established in the delegation.

Page 16 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page22 of 31

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page23 of 31

Bed (MHCB), ensuring MHCB transfers occur timely, and ensuring patients with prescribed
keep-on-person (KOP) medications have unobstructed access to those medications.
While many institutions have matured in embracing health care as a normal function of daily
operations, some pockets of resistance remain. The following are specific examples in which
the annual Round III audit, or subsequent Round III six-month review, found corrective action
items which persisted through several audit cycles, and remain significantly non-compliant:
• Custody staff failing to move medications with patients transferring between facilities
(MCSP, CRC).
• Custody officers packing KOP medications with the patient’s personal property
(RJD/NKSP).
• Diabetic patients not having access to food within 30 minutes of receiving insulin
treatment (WSP).
• Custody welfare checks of patients not occurring following discharge from an MHCB
(RJD/PVSP).

Page 18 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page24 of 31

Section 5: Other Matters Deemed Appropriate for Judicial Review
A. California Health Care Facility – Level of Care Delivered
CHCF continues to remain focused on provider recruitment and on ensuring the delivery of
quality health care to the patient population. During the reporting period, CHCF was on pause
for medical CTC and Outpatient Housing Unit (OHU) intake. However, CHCF remained open for
intake for Enhanced Outpatient Program, Correctional Clinical Case Management System, and
MHCB Levels of Care. The following, additional specific updates for CHCF are provided:
Medical Services
• CHCF continues to struggle with limited medical provider resources and lack of viable
candidates to fill vacancies. While many strides have been made in the recruitment and
retention process and creative solutions have been implemented such as dual
appointments and scheduling changes; this remains the focus of the Health Care
administrative team. To assist CHCF, in late February 2015, a temporary policy exception
for the medical OHU was granted. Also in late February 2015, a temporary program flex for
the medical CTC was granted by the California Department of Public Health.
• CHCF continues to utilize Headquarters Telemedicine to assist with primary care coverage,
particularly in the Special Outpatient treatment areas. Additionally, CHCF continues to work
with headquarters to address the availability of offsite specialist’s appointments and
potential specialty appointment alternatives (e.g., contract with other area hospitals,
provide additional on-site services) to increase access to care and ensure compliance
timeframes are met.
• Significant program changes for allied health services have been implemented and have
proven successful. Respiratory Care Services now offers 24 hours per day, seven (7) days
per week coverage and the imaging process systems has been streamlined.
• Medication safety and non-formulary drugs remain priorities at CHCF and are being
managed further by workgroups. During the reporting period, the number of medication
errors has trended downwards and is a result of additional training and audits. CHCF
continues to work on decreasing the number of non-formulary medications prescribed by
both medical providers and psychiatrists. The Non-Formulary Workgroup focus is on
addressing medications that are unsafe or of questionable utility and guide the prescribing
physicians through protocols and support into prescribing formulary medications. In
addition, they will focus on the taper-off process of non-formulary medication, as well as,
the process when a non-formulary medication is denied.

Page 19 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page25 of 31

Quality Management
• CHCF recently revised the QMC structure to further align with the statewide policy. As a
result, there has been a significant reduction in the number of committees and
subcommittees previously being held and CHCF has significantly streamlined the Quality
Management process.
• A SharePoint site has been created, allowing staff to view current Quality Management
activities and to help facilitate the flow of information and communication amongst all staff.
• Armstrong compliance at CHCF continues to improve. The Health Care Compliance Analyst
has streamlined processes and assisted in training staff to successfully reduce the Disability
Placement Program Log overdue allegations from 158 to 44.
• CHCF Institutional Utilization Management successfully met all institutional goals set for
reductions. Of note, hospital admissions continue to decrease; administrative bed days
remain at zero (0); there was a 13 percent decrease in Requests for Services from January to
February 2015; and this continues to be on a downward trend.
• Significant progress has been made by the HCAU in addressing the backlog of overdue
appeals. The percentage of overdue health care appeals for February 2015 was at 33
percent and then reduced further to 14 percent in April 2015. Department of State
Hospitals (DSH) lacked an appeals coordinator for a period of time and had a significant
backlog. For the month of April 2015, 111 appeals remained open, of which 78 were
overdue. However, steady improvement is noted.
• Town Hall meetings continued to provide all staff an opportunity to meet and ask questions
of the leadership team. The second set of meetings occurred over three (3) days with
three (3) meetings per day in late February 2015. Based on survey results, staff and
leadership both considered the effort a success.
• CCHCS staff continues to work collaboratively with CDCR and DSH in anticipation of routine
California Department of Public Health Surveys, Headquarters monitoring tours and court
monitoring tours.
Nursing Services
• CHCF’s Falls Workgroup, which meets on a monthly basis, continues to make significant
progress as evidenced by the decrease in the number of falls. March 2015 data shows a
39 percent decrease in the number of falls as compared to the data two months earlier in
January 2015.
• Patient Safety Committee is currently reviewing its policy on the use of soft restraints for
patients with dementia.
• The Wound Care Workgroup continues to meet on a monthly basis, with March 2015 data
reflecting a decrease in the number of pressure ulcers and a continued downward trend.
• Increased areas of improvement and focus include a pneumonia vaccination program,
sepsis prevention and early intervention plan, colon screening (which is currently
99 percent on the Dashboard), and meeting compliance with intake appointments.

Page 20 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page26 of 31

Resource Management
• The Resource Management Committee continues to meet monthly. This Committee is
responsible for the oversight and review of the CHCF Financial Services Subcommittee and
Position Management Sub-Committee, which focus primarily on fiscal review including
areas of overtime, contract medical costs, and position management control. Significant
areas of improvement during the reporting period include:
o Ability to provide more accurate budget projections.
o Reduction in overtime costs for providers by 24 percent.
o Reduction in overtime costs for nursing staff by 50 percent.
o Reduction in urgent orders from an average of 20 or more per month to zero (0).
o Stabilized par levels in housing units.
o Recruited hundreds of nursing staff with a focus on hiring quality staff.
o Provided remedial performance management training to supervisors.
• During the reporting period, CHCF was fortunate to welcome back our prior Chief Executive
Officer in mid-April 2015. It was under her leadership that CHCF made substantial progress
in meeting and maintaining quality of care standards. During this time, we were also able to
hire a third Chief Physician and Surgeon and a Health Program Manager III. However, even
with these significant hires, critical management positions such as the Correctional Health
Services Administrator II, Health Program Manager II, and Supervising Registered Nurse II
positions remain vacant.
• CHCF In-Service Training resumed Annual Training for CHCF-CCHCS staff in January 2015.
The percentage of staff receiving New Employee Orientation and CTC Training is currently at
90 percent compliance.
Ongoing Priorities
• Recruitment and retention for providers and management positions.
• OIG Inspection: CHCF recently created an OIG medical inspection audit tool to assist in
preparation for future inspections. The tool specifically outlines program areas and
processes under review, measures of performance, audit sampling size, frequency of audits,
and responsible staff.
B. Statewide Medical Staff Recruitment and Retention
As of April 2015, 87 percent of the nursing positions have been filled statewide (this percentage
is an average of six [6] State nursing classifications). More specifically, 74 percent of institutions
(26 institutions) have filled 90 percent or higher of their RN positions. This represents an
increase in compliance by 17 percent. Correspondingly, CCHCS experienced a decrease in those
institutions with less than 89 percent staffing rates, with 17 percent of institutions (six [6]
institutions) with fill rates between 80 and 89 percent of their RN positions and only nine (9)
percent (three [3] institutions) with fill rates of less than 80 percent of their RN positions. The
goal of filling 90 percent or higher of the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) positions has been
achieved at 63 percent of institutions (22 institutions), and 17 percent (six [6] institutions) have

Page 21 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page27 of 31

filled between 80 and 89 percent of their LVN positions. Only 20 percent of institutions (seven
[7] institutions) have filled fewer than 80 percent of their LVN positions.
During this reporting period, hiring-related initiatives for nursing classifications continued
where a variety of online job postings were the focus of hiring activities. Nursing vacancies are
posted
on
multiple
websites,
including
school
career
websites,
www.ChangingPrisonHealthCare.org, www.Indeed.com, and www.VetJobs.com. Each job
posting typically represents multiple vacancies at an institution, and CCHCS staff continues to
monitor vacancy reports and job postings to ensure that vacancies are accurately represented
in all job postings.
In general, physician recruitment efforts continued to focus on “hard-to-fill” institutions during
this reporting period. As of April 2015, 91 percent of physician and surgeon (P&S) positions are
filled statewide (this percentage is an average of all three [3] State physician classifications).
More specifically, 54 percent of institutions (19 institutions) have achieved the goal of filling
90 percent or higher of their P&S positions. Of these 19 institutions, 15 have filled 100 percent
of their P&S positions. Additionally, 34 percent of institutions (12 institutions) have filled
between 80 and 89 percent of their P&S positions, and 11 percent (four [4] institutions) have
filled less than 80 percent of their P&S positions, which represents an increase of 9 percent of
institutions no longer reporting fill rates of less than 80 percent.2
Workforce Development is continuing to look for innovative ways to improve this trend. Job
postings for physicians continue to be placed online at the CCHCS’ recruitment website and
other online job boards, and staff continue to recruit at medical conferences. CCHCS’ present
and future recruitment efforts for nursing and primary care provider classifications include
the following:
Sourcing – With Workforce Development’s staffing request approved, the additional staffing
will permit CCHCS to include sourcing as part of its recruitment efforts. Sourcing will allow
Workforce Development to access resumes posted by health care professionals on specific
websites where those health care professionals are actively seeking employment and engage
directly with them.
Visa Sponsorship Program – The Visa Sponsorship program provides opportunities for
international candidates looking to gain experience in the United States. The common feature
of the various visa types that CCHCS sponsor, which includes TN, J-1 Waiver, H-1B and PERM, is
that the employer is an integral part of the process. CCHCS is considered an exempt employer,
which means CCHCS can sponsor more employees than the typical non-exempt employer. This
program has proved invaluable in CCHCS’ recruiting efforts for psychiatrists and has started to
be utilized for other classifications including Nurse Practitioner and Recreation Therapist. To
continue and expand this effective program, we have included language promoting visa
sponsorship in all advertising for the P&S classifications.
2

Percentages may not necessarily add to 100 percent due to rounding.

Page 22 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page28 of 31

Classification Salary Review – In an effort to ensure that CCHCS remains competitive in an
ever-changing market, we are conducting annual and periodic salary reviews of CCHCS’ health
care positions. This is achieved by contracting with CPS Human Resource Consulting to survey
total compensation of health care professionals throughout the field on a nationwide level. The
resulting data will be combined with additional analysis of data gathered by CCHCS to provide a
more thorough and comprehensive review of our current pay plan structure against those of
our top competitors (both public and private) and make necessary recommendations.
Additional surveys will be conducted on a regular basis to identify potential salary trends so
that we can stay abreast of the current labor market and remain competitive in the future.
Professional Conferences – CCHCS continues to identify professional health care conferences
where CCHCS can have a presence either in-person with an exhibitor booth or remotely
through sponsorships and other promotional opportunities. Since the Twenty-eighth Tri-Annual
Report, Workforce Development and associated program staff have attended three (3)
California-located conferences for the P&S classifications and two (2) conferences for the
Pharmacy classifications. Additionally, CCHCS has maintained a presence at three (3)
out-of-state conferences for the P&S classification and one (1) out-of-state conference for
correctional health care professionals. This tactic allows CCHCS to increase name recognition
and brand awareness among both attendees and the health care community. Furthermore,
recruitment opportunities at these events are more personal, allowing CCHCS to speak directly
to potential candidates in a way that no online posting or print advertisement can.
Educational Programs Within Our Institutions – As of this reporting period, 13 institutions are
implementing formal health care education programs including rotations, clinicals, externships,
and internships. These programs represent multiple Medical, Mental Health, Allied Health, and
Dental Programs. CCHCS is working to expand these programs as a viable source for
future candidates.
Workforce Development is working directly with programs to provide and implement statewide
standards to our health care student rotations in order to improve ease and consistency for
students and institutional leadership. In addition, CCHCS is working to increase the number of
students/residents rotating through CDCR institutions. Workforce Development is ready to
engage with these students after their participation in our health care educational programs is
complete, to encourage them to apply for civil service full-time employee positions within
their fields.
Medical School Outreach – In addition to expanding and monitoring students as they engage in
health care student rotations through CDCR institutions, Workforce Development is also
working directly with California medical schools in an effort to promote correctional medicine
as a specialty and CCHCS as an employer of choice.
Exit Survey – In an effort to address retention rates, CCHCS is piloting an Exit Survey at one of
its institutions, with plans to roll-out the survey statewide in the coming months. The survey
measures organizational issues most commonly recognized to influence job satisfaction and will
Page 23 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page29 of 31

allow CCHCS to define areas of improvement to aid in increasing retention of its health
care employees.
Correctional Medicine Fellowship Program – CCHCS is in the process of developing a 24-month
curriculum for a Correctional Medicine Fellowship program. The Correctional Medicine
Fellowship program is aimed at providing two (2) fellows per cohort with a high quality,
advanced and comprehensive cognitive and clinical education that will allow them to become
competent, proficient, and professional Correctional Medicine Physicians. The American
Osteopathic Association now provides board certification in Correctional Medicine, which
CCHCS hopes to pursue. This program will allow a physician who has completed a three-year
residency in Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, or Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation the
opportunity for advanced training by completing a two-year Correctional Medicine Fellowship.
Upon completion of the program, fellows will additionally have earned a Masters in Public
Health, and may be eligible to sit for their boards.
The advantages of the new Correctional Medicine Fellowship program include, but are not
limited to the following:
• Creating a platform to train and retain physicians who are board certified in Correctional
Medicine for the State of California.
• Promoting excellence in Correctional Medicine and improving CCHCS’ image, prestige,
and position in the community.
• Promoting
physician
recruitment
by
attracting
young
graduates
to
Correctional Medicine.
• Setting future standards for quality in Correctional Medicine.
• Reducing recruitment costs by hiring at least two (2) fellows per year at a
reduced salary.
• Creating future leaders in Correctional Medicine and improving succession planning.
• Creating opportunities for CCHCS’ medical executives and primary care providers to
have advanced academic exposure and, in turn, boost morale.
These combined efforts (e.g., Visa Sponsorship Program, compensation analysis, outreach
advertisement, educational programs) will help ensure that CCHCS has a consistent pipeline of
quality physician candidates to fill vacancies as they arise and enhance CCHCS’ image as a
competitive employer of choice.
For additional details related to vacancies and retention, refer to the Human Resources
Recruitment and Retention Reports for January through April 2015. These reports are included
as Appendix 3. Included at the beginning of each Human Resources Recruitment and Retention
Report are maps which summarize the following information by institution: Physicians Filled
Percentage and Turnover Rate, Physicians Filled Percentage, Physician Turnover Rate, Nursing
Filled Percentage and Turnover Rate, Nursing Filled Percentage, and Nursing Turnover Rate.

Page 24 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page30 of 31

C. Joint Commission
As reported in the Twenty-eighth Tri-Annual Report, the CCHCS has reviewed various models of
independent performance evaluation and is considering accreditation by the Joint Commission.
During the reporting period, Joint Commission Resources (the teaching and consultative arm of
the Joint Commission) conducted two (2) mock accreditation audits: one (1) at MCSP during the
week of January 26, 2015, and the second at headquarters and FSP during the week of
March 10, 2015. Joint Commission Resources provided two (2) reports that outlined their
findings and recommendations at the institution and headquarters levels. The findings
confirmed what the organization’s leaders expected and highlighted areas of improvement.
Joint Commission accreditation would enable the CDCR to monitor the provision of health care
in a manner that is well understood within the health care industry. Further efforts in this area
will plan around the implementation of EHRS, the OIG’s medical inspections, and the transition
and delegation activities that are presently underway.
D. Coordination with Other Lawsuits
During the reporting period, regular meetings between the three (3) federal courts, Plata,
Coleman, and Armstrong (Coordination Group) class actions have continued. Coordination
Group meetings were held on February 5 and March 11, 2015. Progress has continued during
this reporting period and is captured in meeting minutes.
E. Master Contract Waiver Reporting
On June 4, 2007, the Court approved the Receiver’s Application for a more streamlined,
substitute contracting process in lieu of State laws that normally govern State contracts. The
substitute contracting process applies to specified project areas identified in the June 4, 2007,
Order and in addition to those project areas identified in supplemental orders issued since that
date. The approved project areas, the substitute bidding procedures, and the Receiver’s
corresponding reporting obligations are summarized in the Receiver’s Seventh Quarterly Report
and are fully articulated in the Court’s Orders, and therefore, the Receiver will not reiterate
those details here.
As ordered by the Court, included as Appendix 4, is a summary of the contracts the Receiver
awarded during this reporting period, including a brief description of the contracts, the projects
to which the contracts pertain, and the method the Receiver utilized to award the contracts
(i.e., expedited formal bid, urgent informal bid, sole source).
F. Consultant Staff Engaged by the Receiver
The Receiver has not engaged any consultant staff during this reporting period.

Page 25 of 26
6.1.15

Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2858 Filed06/01/15 Page31 of 31

G. Accounting of Expenditures
1. Expenses
The total net operating and capital expenses of the Office of the Receiver for the
four-month period from January through April 2015 were $604,129 and $0, respectively.
A balance sheet and statement of activity and brief discussion and analysis is attached
as Appendix 5.
2. Revenues
For the months of January through April 2015, the Receiver requested transfers of
$400,000 from the State to the California Prison Health Care Receivership Corporation
(CPR) to replenish the operating fund of the Office of the Receiver. Total year-to-date
funding for the fiscal year 2014–15 to CPR from the State of California is $1,200,000.
All funds were received in a timely manner.

Page 26 of 26
6.1.15