Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), GEO Group and other for-profit companies must be driven out of Georgia's criminal justice system for it to be fair and effective, the Atlanta-based Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR) argues in a recent report.

Having invested for years in state politics and lobbying efforts, private companies, the SCHR says, are now profiting off prison-dependent rural towns and Georgia's standing as the correctional-control capital of the U.S.

"With powerful companies like CCA and GEO," says SCHR's November 2012 report, "...Georgia runs the risk of having its correctional policy be driven by the financial need to incarcerate rather than sound policies regarding punishment and sentencing."

The state's burgeoning corrections budgets and incarceration rate forced Gov. Nathan Deal to reconvene Georgia's Criminal Justice Reform Council to ultimately make recommendations to the Georgia legislature. The ubiquity of criminal justice privatization, however, began with Georgia lawmakers.

Since 2003, Georgia politicians have accepted $382,333 in campaign contributions from private prison companies–the third-highest total of any state over the last decade. In the past year, CCA and GEO have opened two state prisons, adding to the other seven facilities they operate in Georgia under federal or state contracts, and now incarcerate ...

Despite the compassionate tone on immigration during the presidential campaign, the federal government continues to prosecute and incarcerate undocumented immigrants not for violent or property offenses, but simply for entering the United States. A September 2012 report from Austin, Texas-based Grassroots Leadership cites the millions of dollars spent on lobbying efforts and campaign contributions by the private prison industry as a leading cause.

Since 2005, when the Bush Administration launched Operation Streamline, which requires all undocumented border-crossers to be criminally-charged with unlawful entry or re-entry. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and GEO Group - the two largest for-profit companies in the U.S. imprisoning undocumented immigrants - have seen their annual federal revenues increase by a combined $780 million. With the Obama Administration’s continuation of Streamline, CCA was paid $744 million and GEO was paid $640 million by the feds in FY 2011 alone.

According to Grassroots Leadership, contracts for Criminal Alien Requirement (CAR) prisons, which currently hold about 25,000 immigrant prisoners each, are driving those revenues.

"The terms of CAR contracts include incentives—and sometimes guarantees—to fill facilities near capacity with immigrant prisoners,"' the report said.

A CAR contract granted to CCA in October 2011 Grassroots Leadership said, stipulated that the ...

A Florida Circuit Court held the City of Pembroke Pines did not waive its right to deny water to a Correction Corporation of America (CCA) facility.

CCA bought a plot of land in 1988 in hopes of winning a contract to build a 750 bed women’s jail in unincorporated Broward County, who later withdrew plans to build the jail.  CCA then hoped to build an ICE detention center on the plot, but the federal government decided to not build that facility.

In 2000, the plot of land became part of the Town of Southwest Ranches.  No plans were presented by CCA for building on the industrial zoned cite.  CCA, however, was seeking to force the City of Pembroke Pines to fulfill its decade long quest to connect the site to its water utilities.

The Court held The City does not have a “duty” to provide that service in an area outside its jurisdictional limits.  There was no contractual agreement, city zone, or City Commission vote to require or allow such service.  As such, The City, was not required to provide water utility service.

See: City of Pembroke Pines v. Corrections Corporation of America, Florida Broward County Circuit Court, Case ...

Two former Illinois jail guards who were employed by the Lake County Sheriff's Office north of Chicago were indicted October 29, 2014, on felony charges related to the death of a homeless man booked into jail for minor offenses.

Rodney Holmes and Robert Schlesser each face as much as two years to five years in prison for official misconduct, a Class 3 felony, in the Halloween 2011 arrest of Eugene Gruber, who was 51 and had been charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct.

After Gruber allegedly began fighting with guards trying to book him into the Lake County Jail, Holmes and Schlesser disabled Gruber with pepper spray and then threw him to the ground in one of the jail's shower areas.

The "take down," as jail officials called it, resulted in Gruber suffering a spinal cord injury.

Afterward, while ignoring Gruber's complaints about his back, the guards then dragged him through the jail to be fingerprinted and to take his mugshot.

A member of the jail's medical staff—then employed by private healthcare provider Correct Care Solutions, which has since been replaced by another private contractor—later checked on Gruber's condition, but told guards that Gruber was faking an injury, according to ...

Some enterprising prison guards at the River Correctional Institution set up a profitable smuggling operation for several years, accepting bribes from prisoners to smuggle cell phones and other contraband such as tobacco products into the Winton, North Carolina prison. At least one prisoner at that institution, Kenneth Dodd, paid thousands of dollars to those guards, employed by the GEO private prison group.

The contraband items were found after a search of the prisoner’s cell and their discovery triggered an investigation by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice (DOJ). Of course, whenever DOJ officials or their contractors are embarrassed by such blatant corruption, they generally reserve the most serious punishment for the prisoners involved, not the corrupt guards, who are generally fired and not prosecuted.

In this instance Mr. Dodd was prosecuted for his part in the smuggling operation for violation of 18 U.S.C. 201(b)(1)(C) and 18 U.S.C. 371, and pleaded guilty to bribing a private correctional officer. His sentence was enhanced by the district court judge under U.S.S.G. Section 2C1.1(b)(3), because the offense involved a “public official” in a “sensitive position.  This distinction is significant because private prisons routinely seek to avoid liability under federal statutes that cover ...

Despite recent efforts to reduce federal prisoner counts and corrections expenses, private corporations continue to reap a financial windfall from other people's misfortune.  Several corporations have fattened their balance sheets as private prison operators and numerous health care providers have received billions of dollars from the federal government, according to a U.S government website tracking federal spending.

Although unknown to most members of the general public, these private contractors in the past ten years have consistently won both competitive and non-competitive contracts with the department of Justice (DOJ) and the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the U.S. Marshals Services (USMS).  Following a pattern common to federal and state government agencies, these companies consistently appear in the top ten recipients of government outlays, performing services and facilities that government agencies and their employees either can't or won't provide.

Of course, one might ask why the government is unable to provide a core service such as running a prison, or hiring physicians to treat the prisoners confined in them, and might question the propriety of politicians accepting campaign contributions  from companies who provide these services. However, corrections has become big business in the past ten years, as indicated by the statistics. ...

Listing numerous instances of its medical, mental health and dentistry employees being assaulted by Rikers Island prisoners, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Corizon Health, Inc. for willful violation of Section 5(a)(1) of the OSHA Act of 1970 by failing to provide a workplace that was "free of recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of workplace violence." Corizon faces $71,000 in fines, including a $1,000 fine for "failing to review and certify correctly the OSHA 300A illness and injury reporting form."

"OSHA found that the number of workplace violence incidents increased from eight in 2011 to 39 in 2013. In addition, during the course of OSHA's investigation, six workplace-violence-related incidents occurred between February 11 and March 14, 2014. These included threats, physical assault, a Corizon employee locked in a cell by an inmate and the circulation of a hit list of Corizon staffers targeted by inmates."

"Corizon failed to address the serious problem of assaults against its employees until OSHA began its inspection," according to OSHA Region 2 administrator Robert Kulick. "Corizon needs to develop and implement an effective, ...

This year, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the nation’s largest for-profit prison company, held its annual shareholder meeting on May 12, 2016. The meeting took place at CCA’s swank corporate office near the upscale Green Hills area of Nashville, Tennessee; the firm has a modern office with a large fountain in the middle of a circular driveway in front of the building.

Around 40 protestors showed up to demonstrate against CCA’s profit-driven business model, including activists with the Nashville Peace and Justice Center and a radical LGBTQ group. They chanted, carried signs that read “Invest in People not Prisons” and “Prison Profiteers are the Real Criminals,” shouted at shareholders arriving for the meeting, tried to stop vehicles from entering the area, and confronted security guards and police officers.

“Divest from this company!” one protestor yelled. “You’re making money off of people’s suffering! How can you sleep at night?”

There were no arrests.

Meanwhile, inside the shareholder meeting it was business as usual – and business for CCA was good. The company reported $1.79 billion in gross revenue in 2015 with net income of around $220 million, and CCA executives congratulated themselves on accomplishments during the past year, including the acquisition ...

An updated report by Detention Watch Network (DWN), in cooperation with the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), has exposed the practice of “guaranteed minimum” bed quotas in detention facilities operated by or for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The term refers to the highly-criticized practice that originated by an act of Congress in 2009, requiring ICE to maintain a minimum quota of 34,000 detention facility beds at all times. [See: PLN, Jan. 2016, p.46].

The policy has been blamed for influencing ICE’s enforcement activities as well as discouraging releases of immigrant detainees in order to maintain the detention bed quota. However, the practice is not confined to ICE facilities. In their report, originally published in June 2015 and updated in June 2016, DWN and CCR revealed that the lockup quota also exists at detention facilities run by private, for-profit companies.

To compile the statistics used in the report, the organizations filed numerous Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and examined records compiled by the National Immigrant Justice Center and the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University. Details regarding bed guarantees in immigrant detention contracts with private prison firms were buried in the fine print.

“Because ICE does not ...

It took eight years but civil rights attorneys finally prevailed in a federal lawsuit against the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC), entering into a settlement that requires prison officials to provide 11,000 mentally ill state prisoners with adequate mental health care. The class-action suit was filed in 2007 as a result of draconian cutbacks in mental health services at IDOC facilities.

The plaintiffs alleged violations of their liberty interests under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794. The complaint named individual IDOC employees as defendants rather than the State of Illinois, as required by § 1983, and also sharply criticized Wexford Health Sources, Inc., the IDOC’s private medical contractor, which has been cited for inadequate medical care in Illinois and other jurisdictions. [See, e.g., PLN, March 2015, pp.38, 60; May 2013, p.26].

According to the lawsuit, “Mentally ill inmates in IDOC facilities are chronically underdiagnosed and undertreated ... subjected to brutality ..., and housed in conditions that beggar imagination ... mocked and abused by correctional staff, sprayed with caustic chemicals and derided for their illness.”
Under ...