News Articles
This site contains over 2,000 news articles, legal briefs and publications related to for-profit companies that provide correctional services. Most of the content under the "Articles" tab below is from our Prison Legal News site. PLN, a monthly print publication, has been reporting on criminal justice-related issues, including prison privatization, since 1990. If you are seeking pleadings or court rulings in lawsuits and other legal proceedings involving private prison companies, search under the "Legal Briefs" tab. For reports, audits and other publications related to the private prison industry, search using the "Publications" tab.
For any type of search, click on the magnifying glass icon to enter one or more keywords, and you can refine your search criteria using "More search options." Note that searches for "CCA" and "Corrections Corporation of America" will return different results.
Private Vendor Must Comply With Florida's Public Records Act
County Circuit Court that held Prison Health Services (PHS) must comply
with Florida's Public Records Act.
The Lakeland Ledger Publishing Company sought records pertaining to a
settlement agreement reached to resolve litigation resulting from the
treatment of a prisoner. The Circuit Court ordered PHS to produce those
records.
In so holding, the Court held the PHS contracted to act on behalf of the
Sheriff by providing medical services and all its records that would
normally be subject to the Public Records Act if in the possession of the
public agency are likewise covered by that law even though in the
possession of PHS, a private corporation.
The Circuit Court's order was affirmed. See: Prison Health Services v. The
Lakeland Ledger Publishing Company, 718 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2nd Dist. 1998).
Related legal case
Prison Health Services v. The Lakeland Ledger Publ
Year | 1998 |
---|---|
Cite | 718 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2nd Dist. 1998) |
Level | State Court of Appeals |
Attorney Fees | 0 |
Damages | 0 |
Injunction Status | N/A |
[1] Florida Court of Appeals
[2] CASE NO. 97-05034
[3] 718 So.2d 204, 1998.FL
[4] July 22, 1998
[5] PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
THE LAKELAND LEDGER PUBLISHING COMPANY, PUBLISHER OF THE LEDGER AND JEFFREY J. BAIRSTOW, APPELLEES.
[6] Carri S. Leininger of Williams & Leininger, P.a., West Palm Beach, for Appellant. David S. Bralow, Stacy D. Blank, and Susan Tillotson Mills of Holland & Knight, Llp, Tampa, for Appellees.
[7] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Fulmer, Judge
[8] NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
[9] Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Charles A. Davis, Jr., Judge.
[10] This appeal arises out of the refusal by Prison Health Services, Inc., ("PHS") to produce records in response to a public records request made by the Lakeland Ledger Publishing Company. The records sought pertained to a settlement agreement reached to resolve litigation resulting from the treatment of an inmate. We affirm the trial court's order directing PHS to produce the requested public records.
[11] PHS entered into a contract with the Sheriff of Polk County ("Sheriff") to "provide total health care services for the inmates/detainees (including federal and state prisoners) housed within the county correctional system facilities." In a detailed order, the trial court determined that PHS undertook to act on behalf of the Sheriff by providing these medical services and, therefore, "all of its records that would normally be subject to the Public Records Act if in the possession of the public agency are likewise covered by that law, even though in the possession of PHS, a private corporation." See Art. I, § 24, Fla. Const.; § 119.01, Fla. Stat. (1995); Stansfield v. Salvation Army, 695 So. 2d 501( Fla. 5th DCA 1997); News-Journal Corp. v. Memorial Hosp.-West Volusia, Inc., 695 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. granted, 700 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 1997). The trial court further found that, in its contract with the Sheriff, "PHS acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Public Records law and agreed to comply with the same unless such records were specifically exempted."
[12] Both the record and the law support the trial court's order. Affirmed.
[13] FRANK, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.